Table of Contents
Overview
Definition and Scope
Environmental economics is the interdisciplinary study of how individuals and societies make decisions regarding the use of natural resources and the environment, and how these decisions impact both the economy and the environment.[7.1] It integrates concepts from natural sciences, social sciences, and ethical considerations to analyze the interactions between economic activities and environmental outcomes.[7.1] The scope of this field includes examining the economic implications of climate change, natural disasters, and other environmental hazards, alongside developing policies to manage these risks and uncertainties.[1.1] Environmental economics applies fundamental economic principles—such as supply and demand, market failures, and cost-benefit analysis—to address environmental issues.[3.1] The field has evolved to include qualitative aspects of the natural environment and human life quality, augmenting traditional economic analysis.[4.1] A significant focus is correcting market failures by implementing policies that internalize external costs, aligning private incentives with social costs.[5.1] This involves understanding the economics of resource depletion and over-exploitation impacts, informing the design of policies that promote conservation and ensure the long-term availability of valuable resources.[5.1]Importance of Environmental Economics
Environmental economics plays a crucial role in addressing market failures that arise from externalities, where the full social costs or benefits of production and consumption are not reflected in market prices. This discipline emphasizes the intricate relationship between economic activities, externalities, and environmental health, highlighting the necessity of developing policies that internalize environmental costs and benefits to rectify market failures and safeguard natural resources.[12.1] Indicators are vital tools in environmental and economic policymaking, as they simplify complex issues into manageable metrics that guide decision-making, assess performance, and ensure accountability. By providing a structured approach, these indicators help set objectives, monitor progress, and evaluate the effectiveness of policies aimed at promoting sustainability.[9.1] Specifically, Green Economy Indicators serve as evidence-based instruments that facilitate the evaluation of environmental policies by identifying priority issues, formulating policy options, and assessing the performance of policy implementation.[8.1] Moreover, the effectiveness of environmental policies has been a subject of extensive study, particularly in the context of U.S. regulations such as the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. These regulations have improved environmental quality but also impose significant costs, prompting economists to analyze their effectiveness, efficiency, and equity.[11.1] The ongoing research in this area combines newly available administrative data with insights from various economic fields to better understand the impact of these regulations on households and firms.[11.1] In addition to regulatory frameworks, the measurement of sustainability initiatives within organizations is essential for justifying investments and making informed decisions. Companies increasingly focus on key performance indicators (KPIs) to quantify the financial impact of their sustainability efforts, thereby demonstrating both environmental and financial benefits.[14.1] This approach not only aids in tracking progress but also aligns with broader societal goals, ensuring that businesses can operate sustainably while driving innovation and profitability.[18.1]In this section:
History
Development of the Field
The field of environmental economics emerged as a distinct discipline in the 1960s, marking a formal acknowledgment of the intricate relationship between economic activities and environmental issues. This period saw the term "environmental economics" gaining prominence in academic literature, signifying its establishment as a subdiscipline within economics.[60.1] However, the roots of this field extend back to the late 18th century, when economists began to recognize the environmental impacts of economic activities, albeit in a less formalized manner.[53.1] The historical evolution of environmental economics involved integrating traditional economic theories with modern concepts of sustainable development and political economy.[59.1] This integration was crucial in addressing the growing environmental challenges of the time, such as climate change and biodiversity loss, by emphasizing the economic value of ecosystem services and the necessity of incorporating ecological considerations into economic policies.[62.1] A significant milestone in the field's development was the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, which underscored the global urgency of environmental issues and led to international agreements like the Convention on Biological Diversity and the UNFCCC.[56.1] The summit's outcomes, including the Rio Declaration and Agenda 21, provided a framework for sustainable development that influenced national policies aimed at balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability.[57.1] As environmental economics matured, it increasingly focused on the economic rationale for investing in nature and recognizing the value of ecosystem services, which are often underrepresented in traditional economic analyses.[63.1] This shift reflects a deeper understanding of the critical relationship between ecological health and economic policies, highlighting the need for integrated approaches that consider both economic and environmental factors in policy-making.[61.1]Key Contributors and Milestones
The emergence of environmental economics as a distinct field can be traced back to significant milestones, particularly the 1992 Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro. This summit marked a pivotal moment in global environmental governance, resulting in the adoption of Agenda 21, which symbolized the beginning of concerted international efforts to address the environmental impacts of economic activities. Alongside Agenda 21, the summit produced the Rio Declaration, comprising 27 principles that urged states to utilize their resources for sustainable development, poverty eradication, and environmental protection.[49.1] As environmental challenges intensified, the role of economics in tackling issues such as climate change and pollution became increasingly vital. This growing recognition highlighted the necessity for economic frameworks that could effectively address these pressing concerns, exemplified by initiatives ranging from pollution control in the UK to Morocco's investments in solar energy.[50.1] A fundamental aspect of environmental economics is its focus on the relationship between the economy and the environment, positing that environmental goods possess economic value and that traditional economic models often overlook the costs associated with environmental degradation. This discipline is distinct from ecological economics, which views the economy as a subsystem within the broader ecosystem.[51.1] The Earth Summit also catalyzed the development of National Sustainable Development Strategies (NSDS), which aimed to integrate economic, social, and environmental policies across various sectors and generations. This initiative underscored the importance of country ownership, broad participation, and effective partnerships in achieving sustainable development goals.[73.1] Furthermore, governments recognized the necessity of incorporating environmental considerations into all economic decisions, leading to the principle of eco-efficiency becoming a guiding tenet for both businesses and governments.[74.1] These milestones and contributions have collectively shaped the trajectory of environmental economics, establishing it as a critical field for understanding and addressing the complex interplay between economic activities and environmental sustainability.In this section:
Environmental GovernancePovertyEnvironmental ProtectionEnvironmental DegradationEcological Economics
Key Concepts
Externalities
Externalities are significant concepts in environmental economics, referring to the unintended side effects of economic activities that affect third parties who did not choose to incur those costs or benefits. These effects can be either positive or negative. Negative externalities, such as pollution, can lead to biodiversity loss and environmental degradation, which in turn disrupt ecosystems and diminish the services they provide, such as clean air and water.[96.1] Conversely, positive externalities can arise when economic incentives align with conservation goals, resulting in beneficial outcomes for both biodiversity and human communities.[93.1] The relationship between biodiversity loss and economic activities is increasingly recognized by financial regulators, who are concerned about the potential risks to economic stability posed by environmental degradation. For instance, Frank Elderson, Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank, emphasized that "destroying nature means destroying the economy," highlighting the interconnectedness of ecological health and economic performance.[94.1] This perspective underscores the importance of addressing externalities through integrated conservation strategies that consider both ecological and socio-economic dimensions.[97.1] Moreover, the biodiversity economy emphasizes the need to conserve, restore, and sustainably use biodiversity, recognizing that over half of the world's GDP is dependent on nature.[95.1] This economic framework advocates for the implementation of sustainable practices that protect biodiversity while promoting economic development, thereby addressing the externalities associated with habitat loss, overexploitation, and pollution.[97.1] By aligning economic incentives with environmental conservation, it is possible to mitigate the adverse effects of negative externalities and foster a more sustainable relationship between economic activities and biodiversity.[93.1]Public Goods Valuation
Public goods, such as clean air and biodiversity, present unique challenges in environmental economics due to their non-excludable and non-rivalrous nature. The valuation of these goods is crucial for effective policy-making, as it allows for the quantification of benefits derived from environmental services. Economic valuation methods have been employed for over three decades to derive monetary measures for unpriced goods or services, including changes in environmental amenities and the value of ecosystems.[101.1] One prominent method for valuing non-market environmental goods is the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), which utilizes survey questionnaires to elicit values based on hypothetical scenarios.[100.1] This approach is particularly useful for estimating non-use values, which are often overlooked in traditional market assessments. However, it is important to acknowledge that CVM can be susceptible to biases, such as Social Desirability Bias, which may affect the accuracy of the results.[112.1] The economic valuation of biodiversity, for instance, plays a significant role in developing countries, where it encompasses both use values and non-use values.[99.1] The World Economic Forum has highlighted that biodiversity loss could threaten approximately $125 trillion in value derived from natural ecosystems annually, underscoring the economic implications of environmental degradation.[98.1] Furthermore, the integration of economic valuation into public policy is essential for aligning environmental impacts with financial returns. By assigning a monetary value to environmental impacts, policymakers can compare these values with financial benefits, ensuring that projects are evaluated based on their overall efficiency, which includes financial, economic, and environmental considerations.[113.1] This approach not only aids in decision-making but also emphasizes the importance of sustainable development in economic planning.[114.1]Resource Management
Sustainable Use of Natural Resources
Sustainable resource management is a core element of environmental economics, which examines how societies utilize natural resources responsibly to maintain ecological balance and economic sustainability. This discipline seeks to develop policies that foster sustainable economic growth by managing natural resources wisely, controlling pollution, and valuing environmental assets.[127.1] Understanding sustainable resource management requires considering amenity resources, which are unique combinations of natural resources that enhance economic activity and quality of life. This approach broadens the conventional understanding of natural resources by incorporating environmental and human life quality aspects, emphasizing their significance in production processes.[126.1] The interconnection between economic development and environmental protection underscores the necessity for integrated policies.[128.1] The biodiversity economy has become vital in sustainable resource management, focusing on conserving and sustainably using biodiversity for economic development. This perspective recognizes the essential role of Earth's diverse life forms in human survival and prosperity, advocating for the involvement of traditional communities in resource management and addressing issues like biopiracy.[129.1] Despite its importance, integrating biodiversity into economic sectors remains challenging, with many nations struggling to incorporate these considerations into their National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans (NBSAPs).[130.1] Biodiversity's economic impact is profound, with over half of the global GDP depending on healthy ecosystems. Many companies, especially those in the S&P Global Broad Market Index, rely significantly on nature for their operations.[132.1] Thus, policies promoting sustainable production and consumption patterns are crucial for economic growth and biodiversity preservation.[131.1] To evaluate the success of environmental policies in achieving sustainable resource management, various metrics and indicators are used, such as public opinion polls, election results, and specific sustainability metrics that track policy impact.[139.1] Effective evaluation tools and systematic approaches are essential for ensuring that environmental regulations yield meaningful outcomes in resource management.[140.1]Economic Incentives and Property Rights
Economic incentives play a crucial role in promoting sustainable resource management by influencing behavior and decision-making among stakeholders. Various economic tools, such as environmental taxes, subsidies, and tradable permits, have been identified as effective mechanisms for achieving environmental sustainability. For instance, environmental taxes and emissions trading systems (ETS) directly target emissions, while subsidies and grants encourage environmentally friendly activities, thereby fostering a more sustainable approach to resource management.[133.1] Moreover, the implementation of fiscal policies significantly impacts the allocation of resources and the incentives that guide economies towards sustainable practices. The World Bank emphasizes that these policies are essential for negotiating the complex landscape of sustainability, aiming for a future where the prudent use of natural resources is integral to economic and environmental stability.[135.1] Research focusing on the BRICS nations from 2000 to 2021 highlights the dynamic effects of fiscal measures, including tax incentives, on green economic growth, underscoring the importance of these tools in promoting sustainable resource management.[135.1] In addition to taxes and subsidies, carbon taxation has emerged as a vital strategy for enhancing the efficient use of natural resources. Studies indicate that carbon taxes and fiscal policies serve as effective economic instruments in addressing environmental sustainability challenges within the BRICS economies.[136.1] These findings contribute to a broader understanding of how economic strategies can facilitate sustainable resource administration and inform policy formation.[136.1] However, it is also critical to reform natural resource management policies that inadvertently subsidize resource extraction, as these practices can lead to resource depletion and trade distortions.[134.1] By addressing these issues, policymakers can create a more conducive environment for sustainable resource management, ensuring that economic incentives align with environmental goals.In this section:
Pollution Control
Pollution Abatement Technologies
The future of pollution abatement technologies is increasingly influenced by technological advancements, regulatory changes, and a heightened focus on sustainability and public health. As industries evolve, there is a growing demand for efficient and effective solutions such as fume extraction, dust collection, mist collection, and smoke absorption technologies, which are essential for mitigating air pollution.[177.1] Moreover, the collaboration among various stakeholders is pivotal in shaping effective air pollution control technologies. This collective effort ensures that comprehensive frameworks not only meet legal compliance but also prioritize public health benefits, thereby fostering a sustainable future for all.[178.1] The integration of these technologies with a commitment to public health outcomes reflects a significant evolution in the approach to pollution control, emphasizing the importance of sustainability in environmental economics.Policy Design for Pollution Management
Effective policy design for pollution management is crucial in balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability. Economic instruments, which leverage market incentives, have emerged as a flexible and cost-effective alternative to traditional regulatory measures. These instruments, such as tradable permits and pollution charges, encourage firms to incorporate pollution abatement into their production and consumption decisions, fostering innovation in finding the least costly methods of reducing emissions.[180.1] The role of environmental economics is pivotal in this context, as it examines the economic impacts of environmental policies and seeks to design cost-effective strategies for resource management.[166.1] For instance, the OECD has conducted extensive research demonstrating that stringent environmental policies can achieve substantial environmental benefits without significantly harming economic performance or employment.[170.1] This underscores the potential for well-designed policies to promote both economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness. In practice, various countries have implemented strategic policy measures aimed at mitigating urban air pollution. A notable example is China's APPCAP initiative, which combines regulatory measures, technological advancements, and improvements in public transportation infrastructure to effectively reduce air pollution levels in targeted cities.[169.1] Such case studies illustrate the importance of integrating multiple approaches to achieve desired environmental outcomes while maintaining economic viability. Furthermore, the economic benefits of pollution control strategies often outweigh their costs. A systematic review of studies indicated that nearly 70% of the analyzed cases reported greater economic benefits from implementing air pollution control measures compared to the associated costs.[176.1] This finding highlights the importance of considering public health outcomes in the economic evaluation of pollution control strategies, as improved air quality can lead to significant health benefits and reduced healthcare costs.[175.1]In this section:
Climate Change Economics
Economic Impacts of Climate Change
The economic impacts of climate change are profound and multifaceted, affecting various sectors and necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between climate science and economic analysis. Human-induced climate change, primarily driven by the emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (GHGs), has significant implications for economic systems globally, as these emissions have accumulated in the atmosphere over the past century.[203.1] Research in climate economics encompasses a range of topics, including the evaluation of regulatory policy instruments such as emissions trading and the estimation of benefits derived from greenhouse gas reduction efforts.[205.1] The urgency of addressing climate change is underscored by the findings of the Stern Review, which emphasizes that immediate and robust action is essential to mitigate the worst impacts of climate change, which poses a serious global threat.[206.1] The relationship between climate change and economic forecasting is complex, as warming will incur costs that burden economies, while the costs associated with reducing carbon emissions and regulating these emissions will also have significant economic implications.[212.1] Moreover, the potential for abrupt and large-scale climate changes could lead to substantial economic losses, with estimates suggesting that a temperature increase of 5-6°C could result in a 5-10% loss in global GDP, disproportionately affecting poorer nations.[213.1] To effectively assess the economic impacts of climate change, various modeling approaches are employed. These include structural modeling, which specifies the climate change-economy relationship across different impact categories, and statistical modeling, which utilizes historical data to estimate how the global economy evolves in response to climate change.[214.1] However, there remains a critical need for improved understanding of the mechanisms behind divergent estimates of climate-driven economic losses, as well as for more comprehensive representation of their drivers in estimation methods.[214.1] In light of these challenges, the integration of climate science into economic models is crucial. Economists like William Nordhaus have pioneered efforts to incorporate insights from natural and climate sciences into long-term macroeconomic models, exemplified by the development of the Dynamic Integrated Climate Economy (DICE) model.[230.1] This integration is vital for ensuring that economic analyses accurately reflect the urgency and scale of the environmental challenges posed by climate change.Mitigation Strategies
Mitigation strategies in the context of climate change economics encompass a variety of approaches aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing corporate sustainability. A review of climate change mitigation policies across major economies, including China, the European Union, India, Japan, and the United States, indicates that replicating successful sector-specific progress could lead to a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20% by 2030 compared to current policy scenarios.[210.1] This highlights the importance of effective policy implementation in achieving significant environmental outcomes. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a critical component in mitigating climate change risks at the firm level. As stakeholders increasingly recognize the financial implications of climate change, companies are compelled to adopt CSR initiatives not merely as optional strategies but as essential practices for sustainability.[216.1] These initiatives serve as strategic buffers that enhance corporate resilience amid climate uncertainties.[215.1] By aligning CSR efforts with core business strategies, firms can create substantial social impacts while also improving their long-term success.[217.1] Moreover, businesses are increasingly integrating sustainability into their operational frameworks, recognizing that genuine CSR initiatives can differentiate them in a competitive marketplace.[219.1] This shift towards sustainability is not only a response to consumer demand but also a strategic transformation that prioritizes long-term value creation over short-term profits.[224.1] Companies are encouraged to foster a sustainability-focused corporate culture, engage in eco-friendly operational changes, and build sustainable supply chains to effectively reduce their environmental impact.[218.1] The communication of trade-offs in environmental policy is also vital for public understanding and support. Effective communication strategies can help elucidate the complexities of balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability, thereby fostering greater public engagement with climate policies.[222.1] By transparently discussing the implications of various policy choices, stakeholders can better appreciate the necessity of adopting aggressive environmental measures while managing economic risks.In this section:
Ecosystem Services
Valuation of Ecosystem Services
Valuation of ecosystem services is a critical aspect of environmental economics, as it seeks to assign economic value to the benefits that humans derive from natural ecosystems. Ecosystem services encompass a wide range of benefits, including provisioning services such as food and water, regulating services like climate regulation and water purification, cultural services that enhance quality of life, and supporting services that maintain the conditions for life on Earth.[248.1] Despite their importance, the value of these services is often overlooked in environmental decision-making, leading to calls for improved methods of valuation and greater collaboration between ecologists and economists.[252.1] To address the challenge of valuing ecosystem services, particularly those that are intangible or difficult to quantify, various non-market valuation methods have been developed. These methods aim to capture the intangible values associated with ecosystem services, such as cultural or aesthetic benefits, by gauging people's willingness to pay for these services through surveys.[253.1] The Total Economic Value framework is commonly used to categorize environmental goods and services, distinguishing between use values—derived from direct and indirect uses of ecosystem services—and non-use values, which reflect the intrinsic value of ecosystems.[253.1] Cultural ecosystem services (CES) represent a significant area of focus within this valuation framework, as they encompass the non-material benefits that contribute to human well-being, including recreational, aesthetic, and spiritual values.[254.1] Recent studies have demonstrated that it is possible to assign economic value to CES, although the perceived value may vary among different stakeholders.[255.1] This highlights the complexity of valuing ecosystem services and the necessity for tailored approaches that consider the diverse perspectives of individuals and communities.[254.1]Policy Implications
Integrating ecosystem services into policymaking has been exemplified through various case studies that highlight successful approaches and lessons learned. One notable case is the development of boundary organizations, which serve as non-traditional structures that facilitate transdisciplinary relationships. These organizations help catalyze the exchange of ideas and trust, ultimately leading to the effective implementation of scientific evidence into policy. The GE-21 initiative has emerged as a social experiment aimed at fostering inter- and transdisciplinary science while promoting nature-based policies.[273.1] In addition to boundary organizations, a review of over 90 cases of infrastructure planning and design has identified three significant case studies in developing economies. These include the Mexico water supply system, the LAPPSET development corridor and Lamu port in coastal Kenya, and the Shenzhen sea wall. Each of these cases demonstrates advancements in integrated approaches to ecosystem services within policy frameworks.[274.1] Furthermore, the evaluation of forest-related policies at the EU level indicates a shift towards more stringent policy instruments. This study assesses the vertical integration of regional and national policies in various case study regions, emphasizing the importance of cohesive policy frameworks in enhancing ecosystem service management.[275.1] Lastly, a comparative analysis of mapping and assessment practices for ecosystems and their services across different EU contexts has been conducted. This analysis, which includes fourteen case studies from the EU Horizon 2020 "Coordination and Support Action" ESMERALDA project, illustrates diverse policy and decision-making contexts where ecosystem services have been effectively integrated.[276.1] These case studies collectively underscore the critical role of integrated approaches and collaborative frameworks in enhancing the effectiveness of ecosystem services within policy decisions, providing valuable insights for future policymaking endeavors.Environmental Policy Analysis
Evaluation of Environmental Policies
Environmental Policy Analysis plays a crucial role in the evaluation of environmental policies by systematically assessing their impacts and outcomes. This multidisciplinary approach integrates environmental science, economics, and political science, guiding decision-makers towards more effective and sustainable solutions.[288.1] Key components of this analysis include the evaluation of policy objectives, stakeholder engagement, and the consideration of scientific data, which collectively support the formulation and implementation of strategies that balance environmental protection with economic growth.[287.1] A variety of guiding principles have been developed to assist policymakers in crafting effective environmental policies. Notable among these is the "polluter pays" principle, which holds polluters accountable for the costs associated with environmental damage, and the precautionary principle, which advocates for preventive action in the face of uncertainty regarding environmental risks.[290.1] The precautionary principle has been particularly influential, shaping decisions in areas such as water regulation, where risk management reflects this principle when the risks of contaminants are not fully understood.[291.1] Furthermore, this principle has been codified in various international agreements, including the Maastricht Treaty, which emphasizes its importance in European Union law.[293.1] Public participation is another critical aspect of environmental policy evaluation. Engaging civil society in the decision-making process has been shown to positively influence environmental governance outcomes. A meta-analysis indicates that public participation can enhance the effectiveness of environmental policies, although the impact varies depending on the decision-making context and specific goals.[297.1] The US National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) exemplifies this integration of public participation, embedding it within the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process, thereby formalizing the role of citizen engagement in environmental decision-making.[299.1]In this section:
Recent Advancements
Emerging Trends in Environmental Economics
Recent advancements in environmental economics have led to the emergence of several key trends that reflect the evolving nature of the field. One significant development is the integration of Energy and Environmental Economics, which provides theoretical and methodological frameworks to analyze how economies can progress towards sustainability goals, particularly in achieving a net-zero economy at minimal cost. This integration has resulted in the publication of various articles addressing issues such as affordable energy access, efficiency in decarbonization, and the welfare effects of broader decarbonization strategies beyond just energy production and use.[325.1] Another notable trend is the evolution of environmental economic geography (EEG), which incorporates environmental factors into its research framework. This approach examines the co-evolution of economic and environmental systems and the dynamic processes involved in the green transition of techno-economic paradigms. Future developments in EEG are expected to combine endogenous growth theory and sustainable development theory, focusing on system integration and multi-scale analysis to address regional differences in environmental issues.[326.1] The scope of environmental economics research has also broadened significantly. Traditionally centered on non-market valuation, cost-benefit analysis, and natural resource economics, the field now encompasses a wider array of topics, including climate change and energy issues. This diversification presents challenges in policy design, as it necessitates consideration of complex economic-ecological systems, network effects, and interdependencies between ecosystems.[328.1] In terms of methodologies, innovative approaches such as Contingent Valuation and Conjoint Analysis have been highlighted for their effectiveness in valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services. These methods facilitate the integration of ecological and economic assessments, providing a more comprehensive framework for understanding the value of non-market goods.[331.1] Additionally, the use of biodiversity points as a measurement tool in cost-benefit analyses has emerged as a practical method for evaluating the impact of policy measures on biodiversity.[330.1] Lastly, the role of renewable energy sources has become increasingly prominent in shaping future energy policies aimed at achieving net-zero emissions. The transition to renewable energy is seen as essential for creating a sustainable future, with policies designed to promote renewable energy expansion being critical to combating climate change and ensuring equitable access for all communities.[340.1] Closing the renewable energy gap between nations is also emphasized as vital for establishing a sustainable and equitable global energy system.[341.1]In this section:
Net-zero EconomyWelfareEnergy ProductionEnvironmental Economic GeographyEnvironmental Systems
Challenges And Opportunities
Implementation Challenges
The implementation of environmental economics faces several significant challenges that span economic, environmental, and social dimensions. One of the primary difficulties is the complexity of economic-ecological systems, which necessitates a comprehensive understanding of network effects, strategic interactions, sectoral changes, path dependencies, and varying time lags. These factors must be considered alongside institutional restrictions and distributional implications to design effective policies that address climate change and energy issues.[365.1] Moreover, the transition to sustainable practices is often hindered by inadequate infrastructure, outdated policies, and consumer behavior patterns that do not align with sustainability goals. For instance, companies involved in initiatives like CE100 have demonstrated the potential for collaboration in creating new recycling systems and sustainable packaging solutions. However, these efforts also highlight the need to overcome challenges related to the economic viability of circular practices.[368.1] Additionally, the literature indicates that strategic interactions among stakeholders can significantly influence the effectiveness of environmental policies. For example, empirical studies have documented horizontal strategic interactions in environmental or tax policy, which can complicate the implementation of effective measures.[392.1] Furthermore, the dynamics of international cooperation in environmental policy, such as the comparison of emission taxes, quotas, and standards, reveal the complexities involved when individual countries formulate their environmental strategies.[393.1]Future Directions in Environmental Economics
The future directions in environmental economics are increasingly focused on understanding consumer behavior and the integration of behavioral insights into policy-making. Research indicates that to effectively promote environmental sustainability, businesses must grasp consumer preferences, particularly the growing willingness to pay for green alternatives and the importance of verifying sustainability claims.[370.1] This understanding is crucial as consumers are seen as primary drivers of positive environmental change, capable of influencing market dynamics through their purchasing decisions.[371.1] Moreover, behavioral economics plays a significant role in shaping public perception and acceptance of environmental policies. Insights from this field suggest that addressing systematic decision anomalies and social preferences can enhance the effectiveness of environmental policies.[375.1] For instance, strategies that foster cooperation, fairness, and positive self-image among consumers can lead to greater acceptance of sustainability initiatives.[373.1] Additionally, the socio-political processes influencing climate policy acceptance highlight the need for tailored communication strategies that resonate with public values and concerns.[376.1] Future research in environmental economics should also explore the implications of bounded rationality and limited self-interest on individual decision-making regarding environmental issues. This exploration can provide valuable insights into how to design policies that encourage pro-environmental behavior.[375.1] Furthermore, the integration of renewable energy technologies into existing economic models presents both challenges and opportunities. Addressing scientific gaps regarding the techno-economic feasibility of these technologies is essential for facilitating a successful transition to a more sustainable energy system.[379.1]In this section:
References
[1] What is environmental economics? - California Learning Resource Network — Risk and uncertainty: This area of environmental economics examines the economic implications of climate change, natural disasters, and other environmental hazards, and the development of policies to manage these risks and uncertainties. Principles of Environmental Economics Environmental economics is guided by several key principles, including:
[3] What is Environmental Economics Definition? - The Environmental ... — Understanding the Core of Environmental Economics At its most fundamental level, environmental economics studies the economic aspects of environmental issues. It applies the principles of economics - such as supply and demand, market failures, and cost-benefit analysis - to analyze and address environmental problems.
[4] Concepts and Principles for Environmental Economics — In recent years the development of the field of study known as Environmental Economics has resulted in modifications in some of the traditional concepts involved in economic analysis. Basically, it can be said that Environmental Economics has augmented the set of natural resources to include the qualitative aspects of the natural environment and the quality of human life. In order to deal
[5] What is Environmental Economics? - The Environmental Literacy Council — Environmental economics seeks to correct these market failures by implementing policies that internalize these external costs, aligning private incentives with social costs. A critical issue in environmental economics is the treatment of future costs and benefits. By understanding the economics of resource depletion and the impacts of over-exploitation, environmental economists can design policies that encourage conservation, promote efficiency, and ensure the long-term availability of these valuable resources. Environmental economics provides a framework for analyzing the costs and benefits of different pollution control policies. Future developments in environmental economics are likely to include more sophisticated modeling techniques, better methods for valuing non-market goods, and greater emphasis on the interplay between economics, social justice, and environmental sustainability.
[7] What is Environmental Economics Definition? - The Environmental ... — Environmental economics can be defined as the study of how people make decisions regarding the use of natural resources and the environment, and how these decisions impact both the economy and the environment. It is an interdisciplinary field, drawing from natural sciences, social sciences, and even ethical considerations.
[8] Metrics and Measurements Frameworks - UNEP - UN Environment Programme — Green Economy Indicators are key evidence-based instruments which facilitate the evaluation of Green Economy policies by: (a) identifying priority issues; (b) formulating and assessing Green Economy policy options; and (c) evaluating the performance of policy implementation. UN Environment supports countries in the monitoring of their progress towards an Inclusive Green Economy through the
[9] UNECE issues guidelines to sharpen data-driven policies on ... — Indicators are vital tools in environmental and economic policymaking. They simplify complex issues into manageable metrics, guiding decision-making, assessing performance and ensuring accountability. By providing a structured approach, indicators help set objectives, monitor progress and evaluate policy effectiveness. Additionally, they generate data that supports further research, leading to
[11] US Environmental Policies, the Environment, and the Economy — US Environmental Policies, the Environment, and the Economy 07/05/2022 Featured in print Reporter By Joseph S. Shapiro and Reed Walker US environmental regulations have expanded dramatically since passage of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and similar laws a half century ago. While they have improved environmental quality, they also impose important costs. Economists have long studied the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of environmental policy, but three obstacles have impeded this research. Our joint and independent recent work on how US regulation of air, water, and climate pollution has affected households and firms combines newly available administrative data with insights from research on trade, industrial organization, and public finance to help address these challenges.
[12] Externalities and the Environment - Market Failures & Remedies — Economics In the context of environmental economics, these external effects often lead to market failures, where the full social costs or benefits of production and consumption are not reflected in market prices. In the context of environmental economics, market failures often arise due to the presence of externalities. The intricate relationship between economic activities, externalities, and environmental health underscores the importance of environmental economics in addressing market failures and promoting sustainability. By understanding the nature of externalities and their impact on market efficiencies, we can develop and implement policies that internalize environmental costs and benefits, rectify market failures, and safeguard our natural resources. Economics Lecture Notes – Economic Policy Economics Environmental Economics
[14] Sustainability Metrics: Measuring the Impact on Profitability — However, many business leaders still grapple with the challenge of measuring the financial impact of sustainability initiatives. This article delves into the world of sustainability metrics, exploring key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics that businesses can use to quantify the impact of sustainability on profitability.
[18] Economic Sustainability: Principles for Long-Term Success — An economically sustainable approach ensures that your business can continue to operate and grow without depleting the resources it depends on, aligning with the SDGs. This long-term perspective is crucial for building a resilient business that can weather economic downturns, resource scarcity, and changing market conditions. In essence, economic sustainability is not just about being environmentally friendly—it’s a strategic approach to business that can drive profitability, innovation, and long-term success while contributing to broader societal goals. These industry examples demonstrate how economic sustainability can drive innovation across sectors, helping businesses improve their environmental and social impact while ensuring long-term economic viability. Whether you’re a C-suite executive or sustainability manager, this program will empower you to drive both business performance and positive impact.
[49] The History and Future of Environmental Economics - UBS — As a result, Agenda 21 was born, symbolising the beginning of global efforts towards developing the environmental impact of economics. The Summit also produced 27 principles, known as the Rio Declaration, in which each state pledges to use their resources to create sustainable development and economic policies, eradicate poverty and protect the
[50] Environmental Economics - Notes and Resources from the Livestream - tutor2u — As environmental issues become more pressing, the role of economics in addressing climate change, pollution, and sustainable energy solutions has never been more critical. From river pollution in the UK to Morocco's ambitious solar energy investments, understanding the economic principles behind these challenges can help us craft better policies for the future. This blog post explores key
[51] Environmental Economics: Definition, Importance, and Example - Investopedia — The difference is that environmental economics studies the relationship between the environment and the economy, while ecological economics considers the economy to be a subsystem of the wider ecosystem.
[53] The Early History of Environmental Economics - SSRN — Abstract This paper considers economists' treatment of problems related to the environment prior to the establishment of environmental economics as a separate field in the 1960s. In discussing the literature from the late 18th century onwards, it looks on the one hand for awareness in the work of the early economists of the effects of economic activity on the natural and social environment
[56] Earth Summit (1992) - Encyclopedia.com — In June 1992 representatives from 172 nations convened in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), commonly called the Earth Summit. The Earth Summit also led to the establishment of the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Rio Earth Summit also produced two international environmental treaties, Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is an international treaty proposed at the Rio Earth Summit. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/energy-government-and-defense-magazines/earth-summit-1992 . Retrieved January 08, 2025 from Encyclopedia.com: https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/energy-government-and-defense-magazines/earth-summit-1992 Encyclopedia.com gives you the ability to cite reference entries and articles according to common styles from the Modern Language Association (MLA), The Chicago Manual of Style, and the American Psychological Association (APA). Earth First!
[57] PDF — M ANAGING LAND SUSTAINABLY Calls on governments to develop policies that take into account the land-resource base, population changes, and the interests of local people; improve and enforce laws and regulations to support the sustainable use of land, and restrict the transfer of productive arable land to other uses; use techniques such as landscape ecological planning that focus on an ecosystem or a watershed, and encourage sustainable livelihoods; include appropriate traditional and indigenous land-use practices, such as pastoralism, traditional land reserves, and terraced agriculture in land management; encourage the active participation in decision-making of those affected groups that have often been excluded, such as women, youth, indigenous people, and other local communities; test ways of putting the value of land and ecosystems into national reports on economic performance; ensure that institutions that deal with land and natural resources integrate environmental, social, and economic issues into planning.
[59] An Intellectual History of Environmental Economics — Abstract From modest beginnings in the 1960s, environmental economics has grown to be a major subdiscipline of economics. It combines traditional work in the field of welfare economics and the theory of economic growth with more recent perspectives on the political economy of choosing policy instruments and the philosophy of sustainable development. The central tenets are that environmental
[60] The Early History of Environmental Economics — Introduction. Environmental economics 1 is a relatively new field of specialization in economics: Many writers on the history of the subject, for example, Pearce (2002), trace its beginnings to the 1960s.While it is true that it was during the 1960s that the term "environmental economics" came to be used in the titles of books and articles, leading over time to the establishment of
[61] The History and Future of Environmental Economics - UBS — As the world makes a conscious effort towards a more sustainable way of living, understanding how environmental economics impacts our society becomes more important. The report stated that “critical global environmental problems were primarily the result of the enormous poverty of the South and the non-sustainable patterns of consumption and production in the North.” It was from this report that the phrase ‘sustainable development’ was coined, with the main goal being outlined as to “meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” For more information on environmental economics and how it shapes our world, read insights from our celebrated laureates via our Nobel Perspectives programme.
[62] Economic and financial impacts of nature degradation and biodiversity loss — As in the case of the more familiar climate-related impacts, the physical risks from the threat that nature degradation poses to economic activities dependent on ecosystems can be distinguished from the transition risks arising from changes in policy, legal precedent, consumer preferences and market sentiment, etc. Similarly, the Banque de France found that 42% of the value of securities held by French financial institutions comes from issuers that are critically dependent on ecosystem services, with a biodiversity footprint comparable to the loss of 13 million hectares of pristine nature. Assessments for the Irish and Lithuanian financial sectors have reported similar findings, underscoring the widespread relevance of nature-related financial risks. Box 1 explores the ongoing research in more detail.
[63] The Economic Case for Nature - World Bank Group — OVERVIEW. The Economic Case for Nature is part of a series of papers by the World Bank that lays out the economic rationale for investing in nature and recognizes how economies rely on nature for services that are largely underpriced.This report presents a first-of-its-kind integrated ecosystem-economy modelling exercise to assess economic policy responses to the global biodiversity crisis.
[73] Successes and Shortcomings in the Implementation of National ... — At the 1992 Earth Summit, countries agreed to adopt a National Sustainable Development Strategy (NSDS) which should comprise the integration of economic, social, and environmental policies across sectors, territories, and generations; country ownership and commitment; broad participation and effective partnerships; development of the necessary
[74] The Earth Summit: introduction - Maurice Strong — Governments recognized the need to redirect international and national plans and policies to ensure that all economic decisions fully took into account any environmental impact. And the message has produced results, making eco-efficiency a guiding principle for business and governments alike.
[93] Environmental Economics of Biodiversity Conservation — These examples demonstrate that when economic incentives align with conservation goals, it can lead to significant positive outcomes for biodiversity and human communities alike. ... UNEP's work in fostering international cooperation and developing global environmental norms is instrumental in addressing biodiversity loss. The CBD's
[94] The Economics of Biodiversity Loss - E-Axes Forum — Some of this interest has come from financial regulators focused on the possible risks to economic activity and financial stability from a loss of biodiversity. For example, in June 2023, Frank Elderson, Vice-Chair of the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank (ECB), wrote that "destroying nature means destroying the economy
[95] Biodiversity economies | UNEP - UN Environment Programme — Understanding the biodiversity economy Habitat loss, overexploitation of resources, pollution and the climate crisis are the main drivers of biodiversity loss. With over half of the world's GDP dependent on nature, it's clear that economic stability is closely tied to ecosystem health. The biodiversity economy shifts the focus to conserving, restoring and sustainably using biodiversity as
[96] 20 Examples of Biodiversity Loss & Definition - BitGlint — Biodiversity loss is the decline in the variety of life on Earth, including species, genetic, and ecosystem diversity. As biodiversity decreases, ecosystems become disrupted, leading to species extinction and a reduction in vital services like clean air, water, soil health, and pollination. This is one of the most significant examples of how habitat loss drives biodiversity decline. The loss of biodiversity in the oceans reduces their resilience to environmental changes, making marine ecosystems more vulnerable to collapse. This loss of biodiversity affects not only aquatic species but also birds, mammals, and humans who rely on clean water for drinking, irrigation, and recreation. Addressing habitat destruction, pollution, and other human activities can help mitigate the loss of species and ensure the continued provision of essential ecosystem services.
[97] PDF — Addressing the economic and social implications of biodiversity loss requires integrated conservation strategies that consider both ecological and socio-economic dimensions. Governments, businesses and communities must collaborate to implement sustainable practices that protect biodiversity while promoting economic and social development.
[98] Why Is Biodiversity Important To The Economy? - refinq.com — The Global Financial Implications Biodiversity loss has global economic consequences. According to the World Economic Forum, the loss of biodiversity could threaten around $125 trillion in value derived from natural ecosystems each year. This is the value generated by natural capital, which supports various industries and livelihoods across the
[99] (PDF) Economic of biodiversity: The importance of studies aimed at ... — According to Naidoo (2008), economic valuation plays an important role in the economic value of biodiversity in developing countries. Economic value of biodiversity is included use values and non
[100] Environmental & Recreational (Non-Market) Values - Research Methodologies — The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM or CV) usually takes the form of a survey questionnaire, which elicits values for environmental goods and services based upon hypothetical situations. CVM may be the only means of estimating certain classes of Non-Market values (e.g. non-use or passive-use values-see Appendix below) for environmental goods
[101] Nonmarket Environmental Valuation as a Nonmarket Strategy for ... — Economic valuation methods have been used during more than three decades to obtain monetary measures of unpriced goods or services. Applications of these methodologies are the valuation of changes in environmental amenities, recreation, value of endangered species, and ecosystems, among others (Chaudhry et al. 2007). The application of these methodologies provides a tool for decision-making
[112] Environmental Economic Valuation - an overview - ScienceDirect — Environmental Economic Valuation is defined as a method that derives values from individuals' behavior in hypothetical markets to estimate the benefits of protecting environmental assets, despite being susceptible to biases such as Social Desirability Bias. ... 'Acknowledgement of the social and discovery-oriented nature of the public policy
[113] PDF — In contrast, environmental valuation gives environmental impacts a monetary value so that they can be compared like-for-like with financial returns. A project is only judged efficient if the sum of its financial, economic and environmental benefits outweighs its costs in these areas. If its net environmental costs surpass its
[114] What is Environmental Economics Definition? - The Environmental ... — Environmental economics can be defined as the study of how people make decisions regarding the use of natural resources and the environment, and how these decisions impact both the economy and the environment. Environmental economics aims to identify and implement policies that promote sustainable economic development. A significant portion of environmental economics is dedicated to the sustainable management of natural resources. The field of environmental economics has become increasingly vital in recent years, driven by the growing awareness of environmental challenges and the urgent need for sustainable development. By focusing on the sustainable use of natural resources, controlling pollution, and valuing environmental assets, environmental economics plays a key role in ensuring long-term economic growth that is environmentally responsible.
[126] Concepts and Principles for Environmental Economics — Basically, it can be said that Environmental Economics has augmented the set of natural resources to include the qualitative aspects of the natural environment and the quality of human life. requires the use of the con-cepts of "am, ' ity resources" and "open space resources." Amenity resources are special combinations of natural resources which, when evaluated together, indicate a convenient location for eco-597 598 ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS nomic actiVIty and family living. In approaching a definition of environmental resources one must in-clude not only the traditional economic factors of production (capital, land and labor) but also the elements of nature involved directly or indirectly in the production process. The traditional view of natural resources represented by the productive plant must be expanded to include training, research, communication, transportation, and water, space, and air use, as well as many other environmental elements.
[127] What is Environmental Economics Definition? - The Environmental ... — Environmental economics can be defined as the study of how people make decisions regarding the use of natural resources and the environment, and how these decisions impact both the economy and the environment. Environmental economics aims to identify and implement policies that promote sustainable economic development. A significant portion of environmental economics is dedicated to the sustainable management of natural resources. The field of environmental economics has become increasingly vital in recent years, driven by the growing awareness of environmental challenges and the urgent need for sustainable development. By focusing on the sustainable use of natural resources, controlling pollution, and valuing environmental assets, environmental economics plays a key role in ensuring long-term economic growth that is environmentally responsible.
[128] Environment and Natural Resources Economics: Overview — Environmental and Natural Resources Economics Environment and Natural Resources Economics: Overview Environmental and Natural Resources Economics This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the background of natural resource and environmental economics and its connotation, and analyzes the inseparable relationship between human economic development and environmental protection. On the basis of defining the various concepts of natural resource and environmental economics clearly (Sect. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Deng, X., Song, M., Li, Z., Zhang, F., Liu, Y. Environment and Natural Resources Economics: Overview. In: Environmental and Natural Resources Economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
[129] Biodiversity economies | UNEP - UN Environment Programme — The biodiversity economy shifts the focus to conserving, restoring and sustainably using biodiversity as a core component of economic development. Unlike traditional approaches that often view nature as an endless resource, the biodiversity economy acknowledges the critical role of Earth’s diverse life forms in supporting human survival and economic prosperity. An effective biodiversity economy must recognize the vital role of traditional communities in sustainably managing natural resources, respect their rights and address risks such as biopiracy while tackling the broader issue of ecosystem undervaluation. Disclaimer: Different countries use the terms related to biodiversity economies differently: UNEP is currently developing a think piece and a glossary on the biodiversity economy that will help clarify what each term entails (e.g. bioeconomy, wild biodiversity economy, green economy, blue economy).
[130] Mainstreaming biodiversity in economic sectors: An analytical framework — However, mainstreaming biodiversity into economic sectors is not an easy process and progress has been slow or non-existent (Huntley and Redford, 2014).A majority of countries who have developed their National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans (NBSAPs) under the CBD find the mainstreaming of biodiversity into economic development to be a considerable challenge (Leadley et al., 2014). 1
[131] A comprehensive overview of global biodiversity finance - OECD — Implementing an effective post-2020 global biodiversity framework will demand ambitious and widespread use of biodiversity policy instruments, and other measures, to promote sustainable patterns of production and consumption. It will also require governments and the private sector to scale up biodiversity finance and reduce finance flows that harm biodiversity. While it is clear that
[132] Biodiversity: The Roots of Our Economy | American Century — Biodiversity Drives Economic Growth and Sustains Life Itself. Over half (55%) of the world's gross domestic product (GDP), estimated at roughly $58 trillion, depends on healthy biodiversity and thriving ecosystem services.Of the nearly 14,000 companies in the S&P Global Broad Market Index (S&P Global BMI), 68% depend significantly on nature. 1 (Encompassing both developed and emerging
[133] PDF — instrument, drawing insights from case studies and scholarly literature. Findings reveal that ETS and environmental taxes directly target emissions, while subsidies and grants promote environmentally friendly activities. Tradable permits enable efficient resource management, and PES programs compensate for the maintenance of ecosystem services.
[134] PDF — These case studies underline the importance of reforming natural resource management policies and practices that directly or indirectly subsidize extraction or harvesting of the resource and contribute to resource depletion as well as distorting trade in many cases.
[135] Policy tools for sustainability: Evaluating the effectiveness of fiscal ... — The World Bank states that fiscal policies have a significant impact on defining incentives, affecting the allocation of resources, and guiding economies towards sustainable practices (Yang et al., 2022). The ultimate objective, a future in which the prudent and effective use of natural resources becomes a cornerstone of international economic and environmental stability, is something to negotiate the challenging landscape of fiscal policies for sustainability (Zahid et al., 2023). This research investigates the dynamic impact of fiscal measures, natural resources, policy tools and sustainability, and tax incentives on green economic growth (GEG) in the BRICS nations from 2000 to 2021. This research investigates the dynamic impact of fiscal measures, natural resources, policy tools and sustainability, and tax incentives on green economic growth (GEG) in the BRICS nations from 2000 to 2021.
[136] Economic strategies for efficient use of natural resources: The impact ... — Economic strategies for efficient use of natural resources: The impact of carbon taxation and fiscal policy - ScienceDirect This study examines the efficacy of fiscal policies and carbon taxation as mechanisms to promote the efficient utilization of natural resources within the BRICS economies, against the backdrop of environmental sustainability challenges. The objective of this paper is to analyze the functions of carbon taxes and fiscal policy as economic tools in promoting natural resource efficiency and environmental sustainability. This study adds to the current discussion on sustainable resource administration and policy formation by providing policymakers, investigators, and stakeholders with a more detailed comprehension of the functions of carbon taxation and fiscal policy in the quest for natural resource efficiency and sustainability (Yu et al., 2023).
[139] 5 Ways to Measure Environmental Policy Success - LinkedIn — Environmental policy is the set of actions and regulations that aim to protect and improve the natural environment and human well-being. But how do you measure the effectiveness and impact of
[140] Measuring Impact: How to Evaluate Public Policy Success with the Right ... — Measuring Impact: How to Evaluate Public Policy Success with the Right Tools and Metrics.🌍📊 Leading with Purpose Measuring Impact: How to Evaluate Public Policy Success with the Right Tools and Metrics.🌍📊 Measuring Impact: How to Evaluate Public Policy Success with the Right Tools and Metrics.🌍📊 Measuring Progress: Tools, Metrics, and Steps to Evaluate Public Policy Success. Leading with Purpose Measuring Impact: How to Evaluate Public Policy Success with the Right Tools and Metrics.🌍📊 Evaluating policy effectiveness requires robust tools, metrics, and a systematic approach. 1. Why Evaluating Policy Effectiveness is Crucial 🎯 4. Examples of Successful Policy Evaluation 🌟 Evaluating policies helps leaders: Leading with Purpose Measuring Impact: How to Evaluate Public Policy Success with the Right Tools and Metrics.🌍📊
[166] Environmental Economics - Incentives for Pollution Control — The modern world faces several environmental challenges, with pollution control being one of the most pressing issues. The economic implications of environmental health are vast and complex. Here, "Environmental Economics" plays a pivotal role, examining the economic impacts of environmental policies and exploring cost-effective ways to manage resources. Within this broader field
[169] Evaluating policy effectiveness in mitigating urban air pollution ... — Evaluating policy effectiveness in mitigating urban air pollution: Insights from developing economies - ScienceDirect This study makes a significant contribution to the literature by evaluating the effectiveness of China's strategic policy measures aimed at mitigating urban air pollution. That is to say, this APPCAP policy initiative aimed to reduce air pollution through a combination of regulatory measures, technological advancements, industrial restructuring, and improvements in public transportation infrastructure (Yu et al., 2022). In the context of China, several studies have examined the effectiveness of air pollution control policies (Weixin Yang et al., 2019). The results show that the APPCAP significantly reduced air pollution levels in the targeted cities, with negative and statistically significant interaction terms confirming the policy's effectiveness.
[170] Environmental policies and evaluation — OECD analysis and evaluation guides countries on appropriate policy choices and mixes to ensure their economic efficiency and environmental effectiveness. The results of a decade of ex-post OECD research show that implementing more stringent environmental policies has had little effect on economic performance and employment of industry despite achieving substantial environmental benefits. The OECD has a long history using economic models and quantitative assessments to inform policymakers of the costs, benefits and potential trade-offs of environmental policies. OECD Environmental Performance Reviews provide independent assessments of countries’ progress towards their environmental policy objectives. The OECD’s data and analysis help to ensure that green taxes encourage environmentally friendly choices and support broader tax policy goals of fair and sustainable economic growth.
[175] Estimating The Public Health Benefits Of Proposed Air Pollution ... — Second, a causal association between air pollution and health outcomes is a key assumption in a benefits analysis, and the uncertainty associated with this assumption needs to be incorporated into the final benefits estimates (see Chapter 5 on uncertainty). The analyses reviewed by the committee relied on observational epidemiological studies.
[176] The costs, health and economic impact of air pollution control ... — Nearly 70% of the reviewed studies reported that the economic benefits of implementing air pollution control strategies outweighed the relative costs. The database searches identified studies that explored the public health impact of air pollution control strategies, focusing on those that specifically assessed health benefits as part of the cost–benefit evaluation. Studies were included in the analysis if they: 1) were economic evaluation studies (cost–benefit analysis) of air pollution control strategies; 2) reported health and economic benefits of air pollution control strategies; and 3) were published in English. This study systematically reviewed economic evidence on the costs and benefits of air pollution control strategies across different countries and timeframes.
[177] The Future of Air Pollution Control: Trends and Predictions — The future of air pollution control is shaped by a combination of technological advancements, regulatory changes, and a growing emphasis on sustainability and health. As industries continue to evolve, the need for efficient and effective fume extraction , dust collection , mist collection , and smoke absorption technologies becomes increasingly
[178] Advances in Air Pollution Control Technology and Legal Implications — As stakeholders unite around the goal of effective air pollution control technology, they ensure that comprehensive frameworks embody not only legal compliance but also public health benefits, fostering a sustainable future for all. Commitment to Effective Air Pollution Control Technology for a Sustainable Future
[180] Economic Incentives | US EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — They can use traditional regulatory approaches (sometimes referred to as command-and-control approaches) that set specific standards across polluters, or they can use economic incentive or market-based policies that rely on market forces to correct for producer and consumer behavior. As a result, market-based approaches create an incentive for the private sector to incorporate pollution abatement into production or consumption decisions and to innovate in such a way as to continually search for the least costly method of abatement. Trading programs are cost-effective approaches to environmental protection because firms are granted the flexibility to either reduce their own emissions or purchase pollution “allowances” from other firms who have reduced below their required level.
[203] Introduction - The Economics of Climate Change — The economics of climate change is shaped by the science. That is what dictates the structure of the economic analysis and policies; therefore we start with the science. Human-induced climate change is caused by the emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) that have accumulated in the atmosphere mainly over the past 100 years.
[205] Economics of Climate Change | US EPA — Areas of climate economics research include economic analyses of regulatory policy instruments such as emissions trading, estimation of greenhouse gas reduction benefits, the role of uncertainty, and modeling the economic impacts of ocean acidification. Under this type of market-based approach, emission are set by the cap, but the overall compliance costs may be uncertain [see Section 6 of EPA Economic Incentives Report, 2001 (PDF, 44 pp., 632K, About PDF) and Chapter 4 of EPA’s Guidelines for Economic Analysis]. NCEE is conducting research to assess the economic impacts of ocean acidification so they can be included in estimates damages from greenhouse gas emissions.
[206] PDF — STERN REVIEW: The Economics of Climate Change vi Summary of Conclusions There is still time to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, if we take strong action now. The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change is a serious global threat, and it demands an urgent global response.
[210] A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major ... — Abstract This article reviews climate change mitigation policies implemented in five major emitting economies: China, the European Union, India, Japan and the United States. It analyses their historical performance in terms of energy system and greenhouse gas emissions indicators. The review centres on the sectors of electricity generation, passenger vehicles, freight transport, forestry, industry, buildings, agriculture, and oil and gas production. It shows that the global replication of sector progress would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 by about 20% compared to a current policies scenario.
[212] Modeling the Economics of Climate Change | EARTH 103: Earth in the Future — Modeling the Economics of Climate Change The global climate system and the global economic system are intertwined — warming will entail costs that will burden the economy, there are costs associated with reducing carbon emissions, and policy decisions about regulating emissions will affect the climate.
[213] 6 - Economic Modelling of Climate-Change Impacts — This increases the likelihood of a wider range of impacts than previously considered, more difficult to quantify, such as abrupt and large-scale climate change. With 5-6°C warming, models that include the risk of abrupt and large-scale climate change estimate a 5-10% loss in global GDP, with poor countries suffering costs in excess of 10%.
[214] Projecting and reducing the global economic impacts of climate change — Projecting and reducing the global economic impacts of climate change | MIT Climate Portal In a study appearing in Nature Climate Change, the team compares three common methods for estimating economic impacts of climate change: structural modeling, in which the climate change-economy relationship is specified for different impact categories ranging from temperature-related mortality to agricultural productivity; statistical modeling, in which historical data and statistical methods are used to directly estimate how the global economy evolves with climate change; and meta-analysis, which derives the climate change-economy relationship from structural and statistical estimates. “There is a clear need for better understanding of the mechanisms behind widely divergent estimates of climate-driven global economic losses, and more comprehensive representation of their drivers in estimation methods,” says MIT CS3 and MITEI Principal Research Scientist Jennifer Morris, the study’s lead author.
[215] Corporate social responsibility and climate change mitigation ... — This study explores the role of corporate social responsibility in bolstering firm resilience amid the escalating threats of climate change and climate policy uncertainties. Specifically, it assesses whether corporate social responsibility initiatives can act as strategic buffers enhancing corporate sustainability.
[216] Does corporate social responsibility help mitigate firm-level climate ... — We investigate whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) helps mitigate [firm-level] climate change risk (CCR). Moreover, policymakers, environmental activists, and institutional investors alike are becoming increasingly aware of possible adverse financial issues related to climate change resulting in more restrictive corporate policies and shrinking investments, leading firms into stressful economic conditions (Krueger et al., 2020; Bolton and Kacperczyk, 2021).2 Therefore, undertaking corporate actions to reduce climate change concerns, and the consideration of the relevant economic stress mitigation plans (e.g., enhancing CSR activities) are no longer being treated as proactive moves but as essential ones. In this study we examine the utility of corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a tool to minimize firm-level climate change risk (CCR).
[217] Best Practices for Effective Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR ... — Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is no longer just an optional add-on for companies; it has become a core element of business strategy. Long-term CSR efforts not only create more significant social impact but also demonstrate the company’s genuine commitment to responsible business practices. Many companies have successfully implemented CSR strategies, demonstrating that responsible business practices lead to long-term success. Some of the challenges companies face in CSR implementation include lack of resources, difficulty in measuring impact, and balancing profit goals with social responsibility. By aligning CSR strategies with company values, engaging stakeholders, and prioritizing sustainability, businesses can contribute to a more responsible and sustainable future while benefiting from improved brand reputation, customer loyalty, and long-term success.
[218] 5 Key Strategies for Embedding Sustainability in Corporate Practices — In a time when environmental concerns and social responsibilities are at the forefront of public consciousness, businesses are increasingly recognizing the necessity of including sustainability in their core practices. This top-down approach ensures that sustainable practices are not just a policy on paper but a lived experience within your company. Sustainable supply chain management is necessary for reducing a company’s overall environmental impact. Stakeholders can easily discern between genuine efforts and marketing ploys, so companies need to engage in CSR initiatives that genuinely reflect their values and commitment to sustainability. By fostering a sustainability-focused corporate culture, making eco-friendly operational changes, building sustainable supply chains, engaging in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives, and measuring and reporting sustainability performance, businesses can pave the way for a future that is environmentally sound and economically viable.
[219] Corporate Social Responsibility: A Strategic Imperative For Modern ... — As consumers and investors alike demand greater transparency and ethical behavior from the companies they support, CSR has become ever more important for businesses aiming to remain competitive in the 21st century. CSR refers to a company's commitment to operate ethically and sustainably, balancing economic, environmental and social considerations. This alignment of ethical practices with strategic business goals is backed by numerous studies that highlight the tangible benefits of CSR in building sustainable, thriving enterprises. In my experience, an effective CSR strategy can enhance brand reputation, as many consumers prefer companies that align with their values. By prioritizing CSR, your company can not only contribute to a better world but also position itself for sustained success.
[222] Facing trade-offs: The variability of public support for climate change ... — To learn about public policy support in different communication environments, it is helpful to explicitly measure the variability and sensitivity of policy support. By making people aware of various implications, scholars can learn about the range of public support for policies in realistic settings, which commonly highlight more than one
[224] Business model innovation: Sustainable Business Models: Balancing ... — In the pursuit of aligning profitability with ecological and social governance, businesses are increasingly adopting models that prioritize long-term value creation over short-term gains. This shift is not merely a trend but a strategic transformation that ensures resilience, relevance, and competitive advantage in a rapidly evolving marketplace.
[230] Climate Economics and the DICE Model — Nordhaus was among the first economists who wanted to integrate insights from natural and climate science into long term macroeconomic models in the 1970s. In order to do so, he created the DICE model (Dynamic Integrated Climate Economy model) which is part of the Integrated Assessment Models (IAM) using a Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA). The
[248] Ecosystem Services - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics — ‘Ecosystem services’ (ES) are the ecological characteristics, functions, or processes that directly or indirectly contribute to human wellbeing: that is, the benefits that people derive from functioning ecosystems (Costanza et al., 1997; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005). ‘Ecosystem services’ (ES) are the ecological characteristics, functions, or processes that directly or indirectly contribute to human wellbeing: that is, the benefits that people derive from functioning ecosystems (Costanza et al., 1997; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005). Fig. 3 is a better representation, because it recognizes that services equal benefits (by definition) and that complex interactions and feedbacks are required among built, human, social, and natural capital in order to produce ecosystem services. These ecosystem functions contribute indirectly to human wellbeing by maintaining the processes and functions necessary for provisioning, regulating, and cultural services.
[252] VALUING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES - The National Academies Press — Despite a growing recognition of the importance of ecosystem services, their value is often overlooked in environmental decision-making. This report identifies methods for assigning economic value to ecosystem services—even intangible ones—and calls for greater collaboration between ecologists and economists in such efforts. READ FREE ONLINE
[253] Economic valuation of ecosystem services (Department of the Environment ... — Economists often use Total Economic Value to categorise environmental goods or services. The Total Economic Value is generated from an ecosystem as a result of both use of ecosystem services and non-use values (Figure 1). The use value can be due to direct use (i.e. food, recreational activities) and indirect use (i.e. flood mitigation, supporting fish population) of the ecosystem.
[254] Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods — Cultural ecosystem services (CES) refer to the nonmaterial benefits people obtain from ecosystems, and they have direct influence on quality of life. ... For example, economic 'valuation' treats values as assigned values; social 'valuation' refers to the relative importance or value of an object to an individual or group in a given
[255] Economic Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services — The results show that valuation of cultural ecosystem services is possible using CA. The results show as well that the economic value of specific characteristics differs between different stakeholders. ... Franck, K.E., Benkenstein, M. (2023). Economic Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services. In: Schubert, H., Müller, F. (eds) Southern Baltic
[273] Integrating ecosystem services into policymaking - A case study on the ... — Integrating ecosystem services into policymaking – A case study on the use of boundary organizations - ScienceDirect Integrating ecosystem services into policymaking – A case study on the use of boundary organizations Boundary organizations are non-traditional structures that can foster transdisciplinary relationships and help catalyze the exchange of ideas, trust, and ultimately the implementation of scientific evidence into policy. GE-21 developed into a de facto social experiment for fostering inter- and transdisciplinary science and promoting nature-based policies. Next article in issue No articles found. For all open access content, the Creative Commons licensing terms apply.
[274] Case Studies on Integrating Ecosystem Services and Climate Resilience ... — Reviewing more than 90 cases of infrastructure planning or design, this report presents three brief case studies in developing economies to highlight recent advancements in such integrated approaches: the Mexico water supply system, the LAPPSET development corridor and Lamu port in coastal Kenya, and the Shenzen sea wall.
[275] Policy integration of forest ecosystem services-Cases of Catalonia ... — As forest-related policy on the EU level is moving towards being implemented with more hard 3 policy instruments (Lier et al., 2021), this study evaluates the already existing vertical integration of the regional and national policies present in the case study regions. While the analysis of horizontal integration focuses on the relationship
[276] Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision ... — This paper compares practical experiences of mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services in different EU contexts. Particularly, the paper analyses fourteen case studies selected during the EU Horizon 2020 "Coordination and Support Action" ESMERALDA - Enhancing ecosystem services mapping for policy- and decision-making (Burkhard et al. 2018b) to represent different policy- and
[287] Comprehensive Guide to Environmental Policy Analysis Strategies — Key components of Environmental Policy Analysis include the evaluation of policy objectives, stakeholder engagement, and the consideration of scientific data. The analysis supports decision-makers in formulating and implementing strategies that balance environmental protection with economic growth.
[288] Environmental Policy: Impact & Strategy - Vaia — Environmental Policy Analysis is a critical field that systematically evaluates the impacts and outcomes of environmental policies, guiding decision-makers towards more effective and sustainable solutions. This multidisciplinary approach integrates environmental science, economics, and political science to assess and improve policy formulations and implementations, aiming to address complex
[290] Environmental Policy: Principles, Features and Key Examples — La environmental policy is a set of decisions and measures adopted with the purpose of protecting and improving the environment. These measures, applied both in the public and private spheres, seek to conserve our natural resources in the long term and promote a sustainable development.It is a series of rules and strategies that aim to minimize the environmental impact of our activities and
[291] PDF — the Precautionary Principle has been applied in a number of important decisions, to protect the environment and health. For example: Water: Risk management decisions in water regulation reflect precautionary principles. When the estimate of risk for contaminants in water are unknown, regulatory limits tend
[293] PDF — Selected environmental multilateral and regional agreements that contain the concept of precautionary action • 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity • 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change • 1992 United Nations Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes • 1994 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution on Further Reduction of Sulphur Emissions • 1995 Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks • 1996 London Protocol to the 1972 Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matters • 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity • 2001 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants • 2018 Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean bit.ly/still-only-one-earth 6 The Precautionary Principle International courts have also progressively included the precautionary approach into their decisions and opinions.
[297] Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate ... — A recent meta-analysis 54 finds a positive effect of public participation on the outcomes of environmental governance, but cautions that effects depend on the decision-making context and the goals
[299] Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and ... — The US National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) not only initiated the development of EIA, but at the same time embedded in the process of EIA the concept of public participation (Petts, 2003).At several international conferences following the introduction of EIA, the importance of public participation for environmental decision-making has been formally recognised.
[325] Editorial: Recent advances in energy and environmental economics ... — Energy and Environmental Economics provide useful theoretical and methodological frameworks to analyse the degree to which economies are advancing towards those goals cost-effectively and, in particular, how to achieve a net-zero economy at least cost. Finally, four articles, based on solid economic fundaments on Energy and Environmental Economics addressing those issues have been published. Three papers focus on the affordable energy access goal of the aforementioned trilemma, whether regarding efficiency (reduction of fuel prices, decarbonisation at least cost and welfare effects of degrowth as decarbonisation) or equity (energy poverty) and another one addresses the welfare effects of broader decarbonisation strategies, i.e. not circumscribed to energy production or use.
[326] Environmental economic geography: Recent advances and innovative ... — EG has developed to environmental economic geography (EEG) by incorporating environmental factors into its research framework, considering the operational mechanism of the co-evolution of economy and environment, and the dynamic process of green transition of techno-economic paradigms. The future development trend of EEG is combined with the endogenous growth theory and the sustainable development theory, mainly from the aspects of endogenous, system integration and multi-scale, to explain the differences in environmental issues of different regional economic activities, and to promote the development of EEG theory and interdisciplinary research, strengthening the construction of global and regional sustainable development system.
[328] Twenty Key Challenges in Environmental and Resource Economics — These authors show that the sample of topics has broadened from the core issues of non-market valuation, cost-benefit analysis, natural resource economics, and environmental policy instruments to a more diversified array of research areas, with climate change and energy issues finding their way into the journal. The complexity of economic-ecological systems lead to a main challenge for designing effective policies is taking account of network effects, strategic interaction, sectoral change, path dependencies, varying time lags, and nonlinear feedbacks have to be considered as well as different regional and temporal scales, interdependencies between ecosystems, institutional restrictions and distributional implications (see, e.g., Engel et al. The main challenge here is to better connect the research fields of environmental and urban economics to understand the drivers and dynamic effects of climate change on urbanization and resulting economic development, on adaptation costs and benefits and on the role of institutions.
[330] PDF — Abstract According to the Dutch cost-benefit guidelines, biodiversity points are an innovative and practical method to measure the impact of policy measures on biodiversity. A major use is to compare the cost-effectiveness of project alternatives with respect to their impact on biodiversity.
[331] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing ... — Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods has been promoted as an alternative approach to monetary economic valuation of ecosystem services in Cost-Benefit Analysis framework (CBA). We discuss the potential of MCDA in providing a framework for integrated valuation of ecosystem services.
[340] The Role of Renewable Energy in Achieving Net Zero Emissions — Renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydro play a pivotal role in achieving net zero. This blog explores how renewable energy contributes to a sustainable future and why transitioning to clean energy is essential for renewable energy in achieving net zero.
[341] Renewable energy policy: The role of government in supporting clean ... — Closing the renewable energy gap between nations is vital to creating a sustainable and equitable global energy system. By fostering cross-border partnerships, aligning policy frameworks, and scaling up investment in clean technologies, governments worldwide can ensure that renewable energy becomes the dominant force in the future energy landscape.
[365] Twenty Key Challenges in Environmental and Resource Economics — These authors show that the sample of topics has broadened from the core issues of non-market valuation, cost-benefit analysis, natural resource economics, and environmental policy instruments to a more diversified array of research areas, with climate change and energy issues finding their way into the journal. The complexity of economic-ecological systems lead to a main challenge for designing effective policies is taking account of network effects, strategic interaction, sectoral change, path dependencies, varying time lags, and nonlinear feedbacks have to be considered as well as different regional and temporal scales, interdependencies between ecosystems, institutional restrictions and distributional implications (see, e.g., Engel et al. The main challenge here is to better connect the research fields of environmental and urban economics to understand the drivers and dynamic effects of climate change on urbanization and resulting economic development, on adaptation costs and benefits and on the role of institutions.
[368] Sustainable Waste Management in the Circular Economy: Challenges and ... — For example, companies participating in CE100 have collaborated to create new recycling systems, develop sustainable packaging solutions, and implement product-as-a-service models, showcasing the potential of collaboration in advancing circular waste management.These successful case studies illustrate that transitioning to a circular economy is not only feasible but also beneficial for economic growth, environmental sustainability, and community engagement. By rethinking waste as a resource and designing systems that promote reuse, recycling, and material recovery, society can significantly mitigate the detrimental impacts of waste generation while fostering innovation and driving economic growth.To achieve this transition, however, it is essential to overcome various challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, consumer behavior patterns, outdated policies, and the economic viability of circular practices.
[370] PDF — Crafting winning business propositions to expand your customer base Sustainability 2024: Navigating consumer behavior simon-kucher.com 2 | Home | Chapter 1 2 3 4 5 Table of Contents Drive sustainable growth with Simon-Kucher 15 What should businesses do next? 4 | Home | Chapter 1 2 3 4 5 To promote environmental sustainability effectively, businesses must understand what consumers really want. The growing interest in sustainability, the willingness to pay for green alternatives, and the proactive approach to verifying businesses’ sustainability claims indicate an urgent need for businesses to understand consumer behavior. 15 | Home | Chapter 1 2 3 4 5 Drive sustainable growth with Simon-Kucher In 2024, consumers see themselves as the primary drivers of positive environmental change.
[371] Consumer Behaviors Impact on Advancing Circular Economy — As we strive for a more sustainable future, understanding and influencing consumer behavior will be essential in advancing the zero waste and circular economy. By voting with their wallets, consumers can drive market changes that encourage businesses to innovate and transition towards sustainable practices that reduce waste and promote a circular economy. By raising awareness of the benefits of a circular economy and zero waste principles, consumers can be empowered to make more informed choices that prioritize sustainability. Consumers often face several challenges in supporting a circular economy, including limited access to sustainable products, higher costs associated with eco-friendly options, and a lack of awareness about the importance of zero waste practices.
[373] Behavioral Economics and Environmental Policy | Annual Reviews — This article provides an interpretive survey on implications of insights from behavioral economics for environmental policy. In particular, it discusses whether, and if so how, policy implications based on conventional economic theory have to be modified when insights from behavioral economics are considered. More specifically, it discusses concerns for cooperation, fairness, self-image
[375] PDF — The first essay offers an extensive and critical review of behavioral economics and its application to environmentally relevant behavior and concludes that assuming systematic decision anomalies and social preferences provides an improved starting point for effective environmental policy. Environmental Policy Theory given Bounded Rationality and Other-regarding Preferences 17 2.1 Introduction 17 2.2 An overview of bounded rationality and other-regarding preferences 18 2.2.1 Limited rationality 20 2.2.2 Limited self-interest 28 2.3 Heterogeneity, evolution and happiness 31 2.4 Implications of behavioral economics for individual decision-making and the environment 32 2.4.1 Pro-environmental behavior, consumption and the environment 34 2.4.2 Environmental valuation and individual decision-making 37 2.5 Implications of bounded rationality and limited self-interest for environmental policy theory 38 2.5.1 General policy insights 38 2.5.2 Implications for climate policy 43 2.6 Conclusions 51 2.7 Potential research avenues 53 3. 2.2.1 Limited rationality 20 2.2.2 Limited self-interest 28 2.3 Heterogeneity, evolution and happiness 31 2.4 Implications of behavioral economics for individual decision-making and the environment 32 2.4.1 Pro-environmental behavior, consumption and the environment 34 2.4.2 Environmental valuation and individual decision-making 37 2.5 Implications of bounded rationality and limited self-interest for environmental policy theory 38 2.5.1 General policy insights 38 2.5.2 Implications for climate policy 43 2.6 Conclusions 51 2.7 Potential research avenues 53 3.
[376] When the design of climate policy meets public acceptance: An adaptive ... — The socio-political processes that influence the acceptance of climate policies play a crucial role in shaping mitigation strategies. In this paper, we explore the interplay between social and political dynamics and their impact on climate policy support. Using a simplified model of the social and political system, we aim to uncover ways to enhance public support for climate change mitigation
[379] Techno-economic opportunities for integration of renewable energy into ... — Many renewable energy opportunities exist but scientific gaps remain on the techno-economic feasibility of a transition, especially when systems are considered holistically across all energy sectors.
[392] (PDF) Strategic Competition in Environmental and Fiscal Policies ... — A large literature explores strategic interaction in single instruments such as environmental or tax policy, with recent empirical studies documenting the existence of horizontal strategic
[393] Domestic and international strategic interactions in environment policy ... — In this paper, we establish the most possilbe general formulation of the technology governing carbon-gas emission, giving rise to global external diseconomies, and ty to explore into the strategic interactions,both domestic and international, when an individual country decides on the environmental policies. Through the comparison among emission taxes, quotas, and standard in the perfectly